Let R be a relation on the set of ordered pairs of positive integers such that ((p, q), (r, s)) ∈ R if and only if p − s = q − r. Which one of the following is true about R?
Let R be a relation on ordered pairs of positive integers such that ((p,q),(r,s)) R iff p-s=q-r
Check reflexive:
For reflexive, take (p,q)=(r,s)
Then condition becomes
p-q=q-p
2p=2q
p=q
This is not true for every ordered pair, so R is not reflexive.
Check symmetric:
Given p-s=q-r
Rearrange: p+r=q+s
Now for symmetry we need
r-q=s-p
This also gives r+p=s+q, same condition.
So R is symmetric.
R includes $(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)$ → Reflexive.
Check symmetry: $(1,2)$ exists but $(2,1)$ does not → Not symmetric.
Check transitivity: $(1,2)$ and $(2,2)$ imply $(1,2)$ already → transitive holds.
Hence, relation is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.
For $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$ define $a = b$ to mean that $|x| = |y|$.
If $[x]$ is an equivalence relation in $R$, then the equivalence relation for $[17]$ is...
Reflexive — yes (all $(a,a)$ are present).
Symmetric — no, since $(1,2)\in R$ but $(2,1)\notin R$.
Transitive — yes, because $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ imply $(1,3)$ (which exists).
For reflexivity: $xRx$ means $x-x+\sqrt{2}=\sqrt{2}$ (irrational) ⇒ true.
For symmetry: $xRy⇒x-y+\sqrt{2}$ irrational, but $y-x+\sqrt{2}=-(x-y)+\sqrt{2}$ may be rational. Not always true ⇒ not symmetric.
For transitivity: fails similarly.